Skip to main content

Command Injection Attacks: Types


OS Command Injection Attacks, often referred to as Command Injection, are a type of security vulnerability that occurs in web applications. These attacks occur when an application allows a user to input data, such as through a web form or URL parameter, and doesn't properly validate or sanitize the input. An attacker can then manipulate this input to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the server where the web application is hosted.

Types of OS Command Injection Attacks:

  • Blind OS Command Injection: In a blind OS command injection, the application doesn't display the output of the executed commands directly to the attacker. Instead, the attacker has to infer the success or failure of the command based on the application's behavior. For example, if an application allows a user to ping an IP address and doesn't display the results, an attacker might inject a command that pings an IP under their control and then observe any changes in the application's behavior.
  • Classic OS Command Injection: In this type, the application directly executes commands with the user's input. If a user provides input without proper validation and sanitation, an attacker can inject arbitrary commands. The output of these commands may be visible to the attacker.

Example of OS Command Injection Attack:

Let's consider a simple example of a web application that allows a user to ping a server to check its availability. The user is supposed to input an IP address or domain name, and the application will return the results of the ping operation. However, if the application doesn't validate or sanitize the input correctly, an attacker can exploit this vulnerability.

Suppose the application constructs a command to ping the given IP address as follows (in a Python-like pseudocode):

user_input = get_user_input() # User input not properly sanitized
command = "ping " + user_input
result = execute_command(command)

If the user provides the following input:

127.0.0.1; ls


The command executed by the application becomes:

ping 127.0.0.1; ls


The semicolon (
;) is used to separate multiple commands in many operating systems. In this case, the attacker has injected a second command ls, which lists the files in the server's current directory. The application executes both commands, and the result of ls is returned, potentially disclosing sensitive server information to the attacker.

To prevent OS Command Injection Attacks, it's essential to validate and sanitize all user inputs, use parameterized queries when interacting with databases, and restrict the application's use of system commands. Additionally, the principle of least privilege should be followed, ensuring that the web application runs with minimal access rights on the server to limit potential damage in case of a successful attack.

Popular posts from this blog

Open eClass – CVE-2024-26503: Unrestricted File Upload Leads to Remote Code Execution

During an assessment, I identified a severe security vulnerability within Open eClass, an e-learning platform extensively utilized across educational institutions, notably within Greece, where it is deployed by virtually all Greek Universities and educational entities. Open eClass, developed by GUnet (Greek Universities Network), is instrumental in delivering asynchronous e-learning services. The vulnerability, cataloged under CVE-2024-26503, involves an unrestricted file upload flaw that enables remote code execution (RCE), impacting versions 3.15 and earlier of the platform. This critical security lapse presents a significant risk, potentially allowing unauthorized access and control over the system, thereby compromising the integrity and security of the educational infrastructure. Affected Versions: ●   version <=  3.15 CVSSv3.1 Base Score: 9.1 ( Critical ) CVSSv3.1 Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H Exploitation Guide The vulnerability can be exploited

How I Use Obsidian for Penetration Testing, CVE Hunting, and Studying

In the ever-evolving realm of cyber security, the tools and techniques at our disposal are as varied as the threats we aim to counteract. Among these tools, note-taking applications play a pivotal role, not just in organizing our thoughts but in streamlining our entire workflow. Today, I'm excited to share how Obsidian, a tool I embraced over two and a half years ago while preparing for my eJPT exam, has become an indispensable ally in my journey through penetration testing, CVE hunting, and continuous learning. If you're not yet familiar with Obsidian, it's a robust note-taking application that operates on a local collection of plain text Markdown files. What sets it apart is its capability to interlink ideas, forming an expansive web of knowledge that is both intuitive and comprehensive to explore. Through considerable customization, I've developed what I consider to be an ideal method for consolidating notes, insights, and projects into a unified workspace. Here'

CTF: Portfolio Walkthrough

Scenario A passionate web developer recently launched his personal portfolio website, proudly displaying his projects and sharing his thoughts through a vibrant blog. His focus on design and functionality has left glaring security holes. As his blog gains popularity, you, a skilled hacker, spot the perfect target. Your mission is clear: exploit the vulnerabilities, compromise his site, and expose his negligence. Every weakness is an opportunity, every oversight a path to control. In this CTF challenge, you are the hacker. Uncover the flaws, break through the defenses, and leave your mark on the developer’s digital pride. Welcome to "Portfolio CTF" The game is on. Good luck! You can download the OVA for the Portfolio CTF from this  link SPOILER ALERT: Do not read further if you intend to solve the CTF challenge on your own. The write-up follows below. Introduction I created this Capture The Flag (CTF) machine with dual objectives: to provide a comprehensive training ground fo